Wednesday 25 August 2010

Thoughts on last night

Derbyshire’s last appearance on Sky this season produced arguably one of their best performances, as Middlesex, fancing their chances when we were four down for less than 50 runs, were blown away by penetrative bowling backed up by fielding of the highest calibre.

It is quite some time since even I was so euphoric over a Derbyshire display. Led by an excellent performance in the field by Greg Smith, who showed some innovative touches with his field placings, Derbyshire looked a really good outfit. As Dave Houghton said at one point, they looked a much better side than their Championship placing suggests.

To begin with the skipper, Smith again led from the front. Batting three, opening the bowling, directing operations and then coming on to bowl off spin may not be sustainable over a prolonged period but was an impressive display of commitment. The way that he dismissed Simpson was excellent captaincy. Placing two fielders at short extra cover, the batsman failed to keep the ball down and fell to a fine catch by Clare, the first of several on the night.

Wagg was at his ebullient best and looked charged up when he batted and bowled. In this mood he is an irresistible character and will be a big loss should he go to Glamorgan. Over on 606 someone has suggested that we break the bank to keep him, which on the face of last night would be a good idea. It sadly neglects the fact, however, that to do so would mean that there was massive disparity between his salary and that of Smith. The figures that I have heard from someone close to the player are not remotely possible for Derbyshire’s budget, unless a rich benefactor came on board. What that would mean to dressing room harmony I could only guess. Is Wagg more important to Derbyshire than Smith, or Madsen? Surely the skipper would be on the highest rate, while overseas players don’t come cheap. You could sacrifice a Kolpak to retain Graham, but the other issues above would remain.

Wayne Madsen yet again confirmed his talent as a batsman, with an innings of poise and class, not to mention common sense. The wicket was no minefield but scoring runs was not easy. Madsen accumulated, bringing out the big shots only when he felt safe in doing so. It was a crucial innings and, supported well by Wagg and Clare, took us to a total that was way in excess of our expectations.

After Wagg’s early demolition job on the visitors, the pivotal period of the game was the spell of Mark Footitt, in which the middle order was blown away in a spell of real hostility. When your first ball travels through at 86mph, it suggests there’s plenty to come and the speed gun got up to 93mph as Footitt was way too quick for the visitors. He was aided, as fast bowlers need to be, by breathtaking fielding. Wes Durston’s catch at second slip was stunning, as was Adshead’s diving take to dismiss Shaun Udal.

The wicket keeper impressed me again last night. He fell early when we batted but constantly encouraged the fielders. His glovework was tidy, the only black mark the spilling of a difficult chance wide to his left from Smith. The batsman was dismissed the following ball and thus the drop did not prove costly. One could even argue that some might not have got near it.

Everywhere you looked there were impressive performances. Redfern batted well before giving it away, but he, together with Park, Durston and Needham, shone on the boundary edge. The ground fielding was excellent and the display was that of a very good team. Importantly, after recent travails there seemed a good spirit afoot, which was good to see.

I said yesterday on the radio that the major frustration of fans was the side’s inconsistency. Had we played like that against Northamptonshire in the T20, or at Worcestershire, we would have breezed both games. It may be that late in the season we have found a strategy that could work next year, with a fast bowler tearing in against the middle order and wily off spin at the other end. Jake Needham again looked good with this and I’m beginning to think that 2011 is the one where he gets the lead role and hopefully fulfils the talent we have known he has for several years.

At the end of the game, Wayne Madsen alluded to the fact that he will be playing in a middle order next year of Smith, Durston and himself at five, which looks a good lineup. With the right additions, that could make for an entertaining and competitive season.

In closing tonight, one comment about someone on 606 who suggested late last night that the current poll on John Morris is rigged, stating that the level of support was what Mugabe or Stalin received.

It is absolute garbage and a shame in an otherwise well constructed article. I resent and totally refute any suggestion that I could be even bothered to fix a poll on the issue and to link this blog and the name of John Morris with two such despots is pretty poor. You all know my thoughts on the issue, but like you I am curious to see the thoughts of other fans. I have locked the poll down, as usual, so that only one vote is possible from an IP address (including mine.) The final result will be a legitimate reflection of the opinion of fans but might not go the way that some would wish.

As for me, I was impressed last night. I just hope, in closing as my train pulls into the station, that the same intensity of performance is replicated in the Championship game that starts today.

7 comments:

  1. Interesting comment on Madsen's likely batting position for 2011 - I assume this comment referred to CC2 games too?

    If this batting plan includes the long format matches, that tends to indicate that Morris will look towards an overseas opener, which would not be a big surprise. However, that then leads on to a second question: Who will be the 2nd opener?

    At the moment, Borrington does not fill me with that much confidence, but has potential. Then we move on to Chesney. Does Hughes open or come in at six? I would prefer the latter ideally, as he will only be in his second proper season, but he may just be seen as the man to step up.

    Alternatives - this covers some of the short list of possible targets I have drafted:

    Neil Edwards - is he settled at Notts? I don't recall, but should imagine he has another year left on his current deal. Then there is Coetzer at Durham. Again, similar questions. Finally, Robson at Middlesex.

    None are exceptional and we could have another Godleman scenario, where the player fails to settle quickly. One thing is clear though, we are unlikely to be able to afford exceptional.

    I had fancied Edwards for DCCC two or three years back. Decent average (35), though Taunton's short boundaries would have helped that.

    Of course, Shafayat might be on offer, although I am less than convinced we should go in that direction at this stage in his career - ECB quota to think about too.

    Perhaps, my best guess at present would be a top 6 of:

    1. Overseas player
    2. Hughes
    3. Smith
    4. Durston
    5. Madsen
    6. Redfern/Clare


    MASTERVILLAIN

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mind you, there is then Park too, who I have thought has been significantly affected by his rise up to no. 3, which can be a tricky position to adjust to. Does he drop down to 6? This is a position he historically suited, pre-Derbyshire days? Or could he even open?

    MASTRVILLAIN

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are assuming Rogers is going then? I understood that Derbyshire were still having talks with him and nothing had been decided.
    DCCCFOREVER

    ReplyDelete
  4. As the rules stand, Rogers will be ineligible next year unless ECB changes the criteria used. He has not played sufficent recent international cricket to qualify.

    If we can keep him greater, but that is not in either the club or Rogers's hands.


    MASTERVILLAIN.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Actually he WILL be able to stay as they've amended the regulations so that those who have been here for ALL of the last four years (as he has) can play next year. The question is whether Buck gets a better offer elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It would be nice to thing Rogers will stay and I am sure like with the Wagg situation John Morris will be doing everything he can to get him to stay. Would be nice one way or the other if we could give John a slightly bigger budget. I know that it is difficult but those funding the club have got to see that if our best players are allowed to leave no one will want to pay to watch us!
    DCCCFOREVER

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, if he can now stay, he would be a safe bet to retain.

    I wouldn't hold my breath at this stage that he necessarily will want to stick with us. I just have a feeling his release of the captaincy and our poor season might see him persauded to move on. Hope not, but I am not confident.


    MASTERVILLAIN

    ReplyDelete

Please remember to add your name. Avoid personal comment at all times. Thanks!